Car Thief Twice Steals and Returns Same Car

There is an unusual kind of car thief working a Manalapan, New Jersey neighborhood. A couple of weeks ago, the thief stole a black Chrysler 300 from a locked garage on Lauren Court. The thief later returned the car, parking it down the street from the owners home.

Less than a week later, the same car was taken from its garage and this time the thief also stole $300 in cash from the kitchen of the home. He returned the car, minus a quarter tank of gas, leaving it on the street again. In both instances, the thief damaged the automatic garage door.

Three days later, the homeowner heard a noise and went downstairs to investigate.  He saw a man attempting to burglarize his home.

"I confronted him face-to-face, closer than I am with you now. I told him, 'Son you're wrong for what you've done', he was pleading with me to please let him go,' the man said." He obviously let him go because the guy made a rapid get away on foot.

The first time the car was stolen, the victim left the keys in the car. The second time the thief went into the kitchen of the house, took the keys and the money.

Manalapan Police Department

Police released this composite of the thief.

Why would a car thief steal and return a car?

Most likely, there are drugs involved. He probably needed his fix and used the car to pick up the drugs.

With the composite and fingerprints (bet he wasn't smart enough to wipe down the car), hopefully police will catch him soon.


Peace

Source: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/06/04/police-in-manalapan-hunt-for-car-thief-with-strange-mo/

It's "Want it Wednesday" at Fashion Bug

Want it Wednesday - Denim Capris - $24.99(Plus) and $22.99(Missy)

 $10 off Dresses

Get 20% off your order at Chill Cooling Towels

Hurry...get your free Father's Day Card

FREE Father’s Day Cards at Cardstore.com starts 6/1! Use Code: LUVDAD2 at checkout for limited time

For your linen and home decor needs, shop Anna's Linens

Save $10 and get FREE Shipping on any order over $100 from AnnasLinens.com! Use Promo Code: ANNAS10$

Botched Penis Injection

When will people learn you get what you pay for, and to be satisfied with their body image.  Justin Street lost his life because he received penile enhancement injections from a fake doctor who advertised her trade at "pumping parties".

I feel sympathy for Justin Street's family, and for Justin Street because of his desperation. Hopefully, his story will help someone who may be considering these backstreet procedures.  Doctors have licenses for a reason and if you aren't seeing a licensed doctor, you are taking your life into your own hands.

What I don't understand is how anyone would want to receive any type plastic surgery from someone who looks like she botched her on.

Kasia Rivera should be charged with murder because she knew her "patient" could die from the procedure, and that the procedure is illegal.

We seem to hear similar stories more often in the news.  What is going on? Recently there was a was a story from Florida about a woman doing butt implants with mineral oil, glue, fix-a-flat and cement.

Charging these fake "doctors" with murder will help stop these dangerous, underground procedures. But, sadly, these crooks will always be around as long as there is a demand for their services.

Peace

Blind Man Denied Second Amendment Rights

Crime is on the rise even more so in this economy and gun purchases are also on the rise. Criminals have guns and law-abiding citizens want to even the playing field. Why should only criminals have guns? Being safe in this society demands being proactive if you don't want to become a statistic.

The law provides for and citizens do carry guns in our society, but should this man be allowed a gun permit?  He says he should and his lawyer agrees.

The New Jersey County Prosecutor is attempting to take Steven Hopler's gun permits. The Prosecutor says Hopler has a drinking problem and cannot care for his weapons safely. He shot himself in the leg which required hospitalization and some of his guns were stolen and used in other crimes.

When Hopler applied for a gun permit he said he wouldn't load or use the guns. He received his first gun permit in 1993 with the stipulation that he was not to load or fire the gun. Hopler went to court to fight for the removal of restrictions on his right to load and shoot a  gun. According to the New York Times, he argued that it is his constitutional right to "own a gun, even if he was not fit to fire it". "Afterward, Mr. Hopler said: 'I didn’t think that a blind person would be able to load and fire a weapon. Of course not. That would be dangerous'.”

From the New York Times:

But he returned to court and successfully had those limitations removed. He was allowed to shoot his guns if he was with somebody trained to use firearms. An acquaintance who once accompanied Mr. Hopler at a firing range said Mr. Hopler used a remote-controlled bell to locate the target, firing at the sound.

The police confiscated some of the guns that Mr. Hopler still had after the burglary. Last year after Mr. Hopler recovered from his wound, another judge ruled that he could keep his remaining guns but ordered him to complete a course on the safekeeping of weapons and have his sobriety evaluated.

Mr. Trautmann said Mr. Hopler complied with those orders, taking a six-hour course administered by the National Rifle Association. But the prosecutor’s office is again trying to have all of his gun permits revoked, leaning more heavily on the alcoholism argument, while Mr. Hopler wants to not only keep his remaining guns, but also reclaim the ones the police took. 

A spokesman for the rifle association did not respond to a request for comment about Mr. Hopler’s case, but Chris Danielsen, a spokesman for the National Federation of the Blind in Baltimore, said a blind person like Mr. Hopler should not be denied his constitutional right to own a gun. 

“Blind people should be subject to the same restrictions or rules that anybody else would be,” Mr. Danielsen said. “The rule should be: until you demonstrate that you do not use weapons responsibly, then you’re allowed to have them.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/26/nyregion/blind-new-jersey-man-challenged-again-on-guns.html?_r=1

What is the purpose of Mr. Hopler having guns? Yes, he has the right to own guns, but what about the rights of others. Due to his blindness, he could accidentally shoot someone or something and has already shot himself.

Mr. Hopler should not have a gun permit for the same reason that he would never be issued a drivers license.  He may have the right to own guns, but is it wise to allow him to own guns?

Should a blind man be allowed to own guns? Do his rights supersede the rights of others? I am interested in knowing what you think.  Please leave a comment.

Peace